Given the repressive Canadian
government that penalizes free expression of politically incorrect ideas
and opinions as "hate crime" at the behest of special interest
groups, I need to claim protection. With precedents
set guaranteeing free speech, I am posting this fictionalized
account of the basic Revisionist arguments below:
Testimony of a Protestant Pastor
May 11, 1996
Dear Abbe Pierre, Dear Roger Garaudy,
I am saddened by the flood of hatred and contempt heaped upon you. This
reveals the feeling that many carry in their hearts. Remember, Abbe Pierre,
a devoted man, dragged in mud, will enhance your value (in the eyes) of
the one who judges and condemns.
And you, Roger Garaudy, you have a twofold luxury: in the eyes of the French,
you incarnate two phobias -- communism and Islam. One would think you do
it on purpose.
You have proved that you love the Jews infinitely more than those who give
lessons. But here you are, you also love the Palestinians and Arabs in general,
the majority of whom are Muslims, but sometimes Christians. All Palestinian
or Arab brothers who, for generations, have been humiliated, colonized,
dispossessed, bashed, imprisoned, starved. And you have reason to love them
and to want justice and peace for them.
Nobody understood (and nobody explained, either) that it is because of them
that you embarked on the mad enterprise that consists in trying to explain
(to the ignorant and to people who do not want to know) the consequences
of the horrible extermination of Jews, or the fate of the Arabs, who had
nothing to do with Polish or Russian pogroms, the Dreyfus Affair, the concentration
camps, or the Nazi extermination. And yet, it is they who are dispossessed.
What is contested is not the abjectness and horror of antisemitic massacres,
it is their use to justify the creation and permanent expansion of the State
of Israel and to cover up mad injustices. To make of "Auschwitz"
a political argument to support Israel is to run the risk that this argument
be contested. And when the historical reexamination of the Nazi period is
refused, when the files are closed, is not that really to prevent the questioning
of the legitimacy of the State of Israel and its behavior? Yet history will
prevail. One day, everything will be known.
Thank goodness that it was a Jewish historian (for whom I have great respect)
who wrote 30 years ago in "Les Temps Modernes" a marvelous article,
"Israel, Colonial Fact?" Is he right or wrong? And if it is true
that the colonization of Palestine was devised by the Zionist movement a
hundred years ago, during the height of the colonialization period, is there
no reason to doubt that this colonial domination will end like the others?
It is better to think about it than to curse. Has not Arafat agreed to pay
a heavy price for peace? And, to a certain extent, the Israeli pacifists,
too? Rabin included?
Are "negationists" the Nazis of today who want to revise history
in order to give good reason for the Nazis of yesterday? I will never believe
(after reading Abbe Pierre's declarations and R. Garaudy's book) that these
brothers have converted to Nazism.
It is said that the theology of Abbe Pierre is "obsolete." I know
others who are even more so, and who could do better to be more modest.
As for you, my two brothers, the struggles you are waging, at your age,
to raise the consciousness of all those who need it, compel respect and
contribute to hope.
Pastor Roger Parmentier
Comments? E-Mail: [email protected] Now you have a choice.We do not recruit; we convince. Truth has no need of coercion. We invite
your support and submissions.
If you approve of our outreach on behalf of truth in history and can afford
to help us, please send your donations to:
The Zundel-Haus
206 Carlton Street
Toronto, ONT
Canada M5A 2L1
Tel: 416 - 922-9850
As a public service, we alert our readers to other major websites posting
related materials in support of Historical Revisionism. A suggestion to
surf other sites is not to be interpreted as an endorsement of documents
placed on these sites.